07-09-2021, 03:11 PM
Hi Maarten!
Thanks for your reply.
You might indeed be correct. In this case, any thoughts on how to differentiate the between the two?
我不是很熟悉。我认为aybe it was not just the 4x4 matrix, but included the position in it.
Thanks for your reply.
Quote: The 4x4 homogenous transformation matrix below it is however correct: a roll-pitch-yaw of [20,-90,90] yields the same orientation as [0,-90,110]. Why? Because the three different subsequent axial rotations in this case add up to the same orientation.
You might indeed be correct. In this case, any thoughts on how to differentiate the between the two?
Quote: The function xyzrpw_2_pose which outputs this 4x4 matrix thus seems correct to me. When calling "print(some_pose)" however, with "some_pose" being a 4x4 matrix output from xyzrpw_2_pose, not only this 4x4 matrix is printed. It seems some other function adds the misunderstood "Pose(,,,,,)" line before it, but I'm not savvy enough to see which.
我不是很熟悉。我认为aybe it was not just the 4x4 matrix, but included the position in it.