This looks like an issue with the way the robot was installed on the linear rail in RoboDK.
Even between the real robot controller and Roboguide, there's a setting discrepancy.
Can you provide your .rdk station. I will try to solve the issues related to the frame position/orientation. You can always send them via email if you can't post a striped down version here.
As for this part, I think I understand, but I'm still confused.
Edit: Could it be that the joint direction is inverted? Insteadd of the robot being rotated?
Jeremy
Quote: Tests with the real robot show similar results only there the problem is inverted: the joint positions are at the right side of the rail and the Cartesian positions are not.
Even between the real robot controller and Roboguide, there's a setting discrepancy.
Can you provide your .rdk station. I will try to solve the issues related to the frame position/orientation. You can always send them via email if you can't post a striped down version here.
As for this part, I think I understand, but I'm still confused.
Quote: The real robot is mounted 90 degrees rotated w.r.t. the 3D model in RoboDK but it's calibration is (historically) such that the arm direction at J1=0.0 is the same as in RoboDK with J1=0.0.
Edit: Could it be that the joint direction is inverted? Insteadd of the robot being rotated?
Jeremy
Find useful information about RoboDK and its features by visiting ourOnline Documentationand by watching tutorials on ourYoutube Channel.