Kuka IIWA Python RoboDK online programming Driver——革命制度党ntable Version +- RoboDK Forum (//m.sinclairbody.com/forum) +-- Forum: RoboDK (EN) (//m.sinclairbody.com/forum/Forum-RoboDK-EN) + - - -论坛:通用RoboDK问题(//m.sinclairbody.com/forum/Forum-General-questions-about-RoboDK) +--- Thread: Kuka IIWA Python RoboDK online programming Driver (/Thread-Kuka-IIWA-Python-RoboDK-online-programming-Driver) |
Kuka IIWA Python RoboDK online programming Driver-Xiiwa-10-20-2020 Hello there, i'm trying to get a Kuka IIWA running via online programming. InRoboDK RobotDriversit says that the Kuka IIWA is supported From the update list of RoboDK i can see: "New in RoboDK v4.0.0 (2019-10-09)
As far as i found out there is really a "apikukaiiwa.py" available to select for connecting to the iiwa in the roboDK user interface. I tried to connect over the robodk robot connect interface with this driver chosen, but it said in the log "[WinError 10061] No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it". I believe that i have to start a program downloaded over java sunrise workbench to my kuka iiwa that opens this port on the robot and then listens to commands. Sadly i did not find any tutorials or java files for this purpose anywhere. How do i set up my robot to listen on the given port? Would be happy if someone could point me to a solution or tutorial on how to use the provided apikukaiiwa.py driver asap, because i need to control the robot directly from robodk simulation for an upcoming project demo. Thanks :) RE: Kuka IIWA Python RoboDK online programming Driver-Jeremy-10-20-2020 Hi Xiiwa, I'm not familiar with the Kuka IIWA, but here another thread regarding controlling this robot from RoboDK. //m.sinclairbody.com/forum/Thread-Kuka-LBR-and-RoboDK?highlight=iiwa Jeremy RE: Kuka IIWA Python RoboDK online programming Driver-Xiiwa-10-20-2020 (10-20-2020, 02:48 PM)Jeremy Wrote:Hi Xiiwa, Yes, i know about this thread and i tried this solution already and it works, but in my case a solution using robodk's own connection interface would be preferred - that's why i created the thread. |